What you should do when an aircraft is rerouted.

Advise the R-side to clear the aircraft back onto the filed routing when a reroute occurs. This coordination helps re-enter the planned path safely, keeps flight plans consistent, and supports efficient air traffic management. Clear, timely communication between radar and routing teams matters.

Outline (quick skeleton)

  • Opening hook: rerouting happens in the sky, and how you respond matters for safety and flow.
  • The correct move: when a change happens, tell the R-side to clear the aircraft back onto the filed routing.

  • Why this choice works: keeps the flight plan intact, preserves orderly traffic, and makes sure everyone is aligned.

  • Why the other options aren’t as solid: what could go wrong with each, in plain terms.

  • How the process unfolds in real life: steps radar controllers take, who they inform, and what they check.

  • Quick tips you can use: practical takeaways and short phrases to remember.

  • Close with a practical thought: good coordination is the backbone of smooth skies.

Rerouting: a real-time puzzle with a simple, smart move

Let’s set the scene. An aircraft is cruising along its filed route, then weather or congestion nudges it off course. The radar screen shows a new path, and now the clock is ticking. In these moments, the way you respond isn’t just a box to check. It shapes safety, predictability, and how well the flow of traffic stays balanced. The core idea is straightforward: advise the R-side to clear the aircraft back on the filed routing.

What does “back on the filed routing” really mean? Think of it like a road trip. If you take a detour because of a roadblock, the goal is to navigate back to your original map as soon as the obstacle is gone. In radar control, that means guiding the aircraft to follow its pre-approved flight plan again, using the same airways and fixes, so the flight can rejoin the intended sequence of traffic. The R-side—the routing side of the airspace team—handles those plans and airway connections. When we tell them, “clear back on the filed routing,” we’re asking everyone to re-sync on the same map.

Why is option B the wise choice

  • Keeps the flight plan intact. The filed routing is the agreed path that fits with other traffic, sectors, and airways. Returning to that path minimizes surprises for controllers in adjacent sectors and reduces the odds of mid-air holds or spacing issues.

  • Maintains seamless coordination. The routing side keeps the big picture in view—how all routes connect, where fixes sit, and where airways cross. By informing them, you hand off the precise signal needed to re-establish the intended sequence.

  • Reduces pilot confusion. Pilots rely on a clear, consistent flow. If the pilot is told one thing while the ground logic is changing, you end up with mixed messages. A clean handoff to the R-side helps the flight crew and the rest of the control team stay on the same page.

  • Supports safety and efficiency. When the aircraft is steered back to the filed route, spacing and sector workload can stabilize sooner. That protection helps everyone—from the flight crew to the injector of traffic in a busy corridor.

Why the other options don’t measure up as the first move

  • A: Inform the pilot immediately. It sounds sensible, but it can cause confusion if it isn’t coordinated with the overall traffic management plan. A pilot can get new instructions, then hear a different directive from another controller. The result is mixed messages and potential conflicts.

  • C: Cancel the flight plan. Cancelling is a heavy hammer for a reroute that’s temporary or short-lived. It wastes resources, disrupts schedules, and complicates re-entry into the original path later on. Keeping the plan alive is usually far more practical.

  • D: Monitor the aircraft’s new direction. Monitoring is essential, but alone it isn’t enough. It’s the coordinating action—telling the R-side to re-enter the filed route—that actually re-aligns the flight with the broader airspace design. Monitoring without coordination can leave gaps and delays.

How the reroute-to-file process typically unfolds

Here’s a simple, practical flow you’ll recognize if you’ve ever worked radar control:

  1. Detect the reroute. The divergence might come from weather, a temporary restriction, or traffic conflicts ahead. The moment you notice it, you start thinking in terms of plan vs. actual path.

  2. Assess the impact. Is the reroute temporary or long enough to need a new flight plan segment? Do you need to hold spacing or adjust altitudes while you work the routing issue?

  3. Notify the R-side. This is the key step. You say something like, essentially, “Advise the R-side to clear back on the filed routing.” The exact phraseology can vary by facility, but the intent is clear: restore the original flight path with the routing team’s coordination.

  4. Confirm the re-entry. After the R-side clears the aircraft, you verify it’s back on the filed route and that the flight plan now reflects the planned airway sequence. If there are any mismatches, you fix them promptly, with both sides on the same page.

  5. Monitor and maintain separation. With the aircraft back on the filed route, you keep an eye on spacing, altitude blocks, and any future deviations. The job isn’t done until the traffic picture is stable and the sector workload is balanced again.

A readable way to think about it: it’s not just a single instruction, it’s a coordinated handoff

Radar operations aren’t about blinking a light and moving on. They’re about teamwork across different roles and systems. The R-side handles the backbone—the flight plan, airway structure, and how routes connect at waypoints. By involving them, you ensure that the re-entry into the filed route is clean and predictable, not a one-off adjustment that creates ripple effects.

A quick analogy that helps many students grasp the idea: imagine a busy train system. If a train is rerouted, the operator puts the train back on its scheduled line only after the central control confirms the track is clear and the signals align with the timetable. Without that confirmation, you risk two trains sharing the same track or missing a platform change. In airspace, the same logic applies—safety and flow demand clear, coordinated actions, not ad-hoc changes on the fly.

Practical tips you can carry into daily work

  • Memorize the core phrase. A simple, consistent cue like “advise the R-side to clear back on the filed routing” becomes a reliable anchor in busy moments.

  • Treat the R-side as your partner in the re-entry. The goal isn’t a solo move; it’s a joint step that restores the original plan across the system.

  • Double-check the flight plan after the handoff. A quick read of the updated route and airway structure helps you catch mismatches early.

  • Keep pilots informed—but only after you’ve aligned with the routing team. You don’t want to layer extra messages that muddy the picture.

  • When in doubt, pause with purpose. A brief pause to confirm that all sides are coordinated can prevent a cascade of conflicts later.

A touch of real-world flavor

If you’ve ever watched a busy radar room, you’ll notice the rhythm. Controllers speak in concise terms, then pivot to the next action with calm authority. There’s a subtle art to balancing speed with accuracy. The moment you inform the R-side and the aircraft smoothly returns to the filed route, you see the system humming. It’s not flashy, but it’s exactly what keeps skies safe and routes efficient for everyone flying above and below.

Bringing it back to the big picture

This single decision—advise the R-side to clear the aircraft back on the filed routing—embodies a core principle of radar standard operating procedures: coordinated, cross-team action that preserves the integrity of the flight plan while maintaining safe separation. It’s easy to underestimate how much coordination goes into a smooth re-entry, but that handshake between radar control and routing control makes all the difference in the world.

If you’re exploring radar operations principles, this scenario isn’t a one-off problem to solve—it’s a window into how professionals think: setting a plan, coordinating with the right partners, and stabilizing the system so the next flight can roll in with confidence. It’s small as a decision, big in its impact.

Final thought

The skies work because teams communicate with clarity and respect for the shared map. When a route changes, the quickest, most reliable action is a clean, coordinated push to rejoin the filed routing. It’s not just about a checkbox; it’s about keeping the airspace orderly, safe, and efficient for every flight that rides the air currents above us.

If you’re curious to explore more scenarios like this, you’ll find that the pattern repeats: identify, coordinate, rejoin, verify, and move on. A steady rhythm, a clear map, and a dependable partnership between radar and routing teams—that’s how good SOPs translate into safe skies.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy